Hire The World’s
Top Talent On Demand
Top Talent On Demand
Full-stack DevelopersFront-end DevelopersSoftware DevelopersWeb DevelopersMobile App DevelopersAI EngineersAndroid DevelopersAngularJS DevelopersDjango DevelopersDrupal DevelopersGame DevelopersHadoop DevelopersiOS DevelopersJava DevelopersJavaScript DevelopersMagento DevelopersNode.js DevelopersPHP DevelopersPostgreSQL DevelopersPython DevelopersReact.js DevelopersSalesforce DevelopersScala DevelopersUnity DevelopersWordPress DevelopersAPI DevelopersRuby on Rails DevelopersKubernetes Developers
Toptal connects the top 3% of freelance developers all over the world.
Selection Sort
Animation, code, analysis, and discussion of selection sort on 4 initial conditions.
How to use: Press "Play all", or choose the button.
Play All | Play animation | Play animation | Play animation | Play animation |
---|
ALGORITHM
for i = 1:n,
k = i
for j = i+1:n, if a[j] < a[k], k = j
→ invariant: a[k] smallest of a[i..n]
swap a[i,k]
→ invariant: a[1..i] in final position
end
DISCUSSION
From the comparions presented here, one might conclude that selection sort should never be used. It does not adapt to the data in any way (notice that the four animations above run in lock step), so its runtime is always quadratic.
However, selection sort has the property of minimizing the number of swaps. In applications where the cost of swapping items is high, selection sort very well may be the algorithm of choice.
KEY
- Black values are sorted.
- Gray values are unsorted.
- A red triangle marks the algorithm position.
PROPERTIES
- Not stable
- O(1) extra space
- Θ(n2) comparisons
- Θ(n) swaps
- Not adaptive